Villafuerte cries ‘fake news’ over survey poll, student journalists stand ground
Bea Allyson Alimangohan and Adi Joaquim Tolentino
Camarines Sur Representative Luis Raymund “Lray” Villafuerte accused the
official student publication of Administration of Camarines Sur Polytechnic
Colleges (CSPC), The SPARK, of being ‘biased’ in favor of Bong Rodriguez, his
opposing candidate for governor in the mock gubernatorial election results
released on February 7.
![]() |
Photo Courtesy of Facebook/Lray Villafuerte/The SPARK. |
The survey, conducted by The SPARK from December 1 to 7, 2024, revealed that
Rodriguez led the gubernatorial race with 43 percent of the votes, while
Villafuerte garnered 30 percent.
#Halalan2025 | 𝗥𝗼𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗴𝘂𝗲𝘇 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘀 𝗴𝘂𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗦𝗣𝗖𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀; 𝟮𝟲% 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘂𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗯𝗲𝘁
Posted by The SPARK on Friday, February 7, 2025
Villafuerte called it ‘fake’ as the results were revealed two months after the
survey was done, implying they may have been ‘altered’ the data and aligned it
with Rodriguez’s side.
“Mabuti talaga nag labas ng fake survey etong the spark. Luminaw sino mga
nanloloko nag papa labas ng fake news at fake survey results!,” Villafuerte
captioned in his Facebook post.
He also criticized The SPARK’s associate editor, Fernan Matthew Enimendez,
whom he labeled as 'pitiful' for being manipulated by the propaganda, which he
attributes to 'not genuinely loving the CSPC'.
Villafuerte further argued that The SPARK was ‘biased,’ pointing out that the
publication did not mention the contributions of the Villafuerte family to
CSPC, including infrastructure projects and their support for school
activities such as the Ulayaw Festival.
Sa usapan fake news at fake survey results pinapakalat ng mga fake news king na si Joe “ kabalang “ Osabal at ni...
Posted by Lray Villafuerte on Friday, February 7, 2025
“Halatang biased at may kinikilingan at kinakampihan eto si Fernan Matthew at
ang the spark publication dahil mismo mga tulong ng pamilya Villafuerte sa
CSPC ay never…pig mention man Lang!” Villafuerte included in the post.
In response to the backlash, the CSPC administration released an official
statement distancing itself from the survey, clarifying that it was an
independent initiative by The SPARK and not an official undertaking of the
institution. The administration emphasized that the survey results "are
neither comprehensive nor reflective of the sentiments of the entire student
body."
OFFICIAL STATEMENT ON THE 2025 MIDTERM ELECTIONS PREFERENCE POLLS POSTED BY THE SPARK, CSPC’S OFFICIAL STUDENT...
Posted by Camarines Sur Polytechnic Colleges on Friday, February 7, 2025
The publication stated that the survey was conducted independently through
Google Forms, accessible only to CSPC students, with 498 respondents.
“Nasaan resulta ng survey nila sa 5th district? Dinudoktor pa ba—karamihan ng
students hinde active o gumagamit email,” Villafuerte disputed.
However, the validity of the poll was defended through a Facebook post by
Jericho Dagami, a licensed civil engineer and former Editor-in-Chief at The
SPARK, who cited Slovin’s Formula to determine the required sample size.
According to Dagami, a population of 14,000 students would require at least
389 respondents for a 95 percent confidence level, with a 5 percent margin of
error in which SPARK’s survey exceeded the threshold, making the sample size
statistically acceptable.
𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿’𝘀 𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗲 [re: 2025 Midterm Elections Preference Polls] As the result of the mock election on the gubernatorial...
Posted by The SPARK on Saturday, February 8, 2025
The SPARK Editorial Board released an official statement defending the
integrity of the survey as the results were presented as they were, without
manipulation or external intervention.
“Results were presented as it is without manipulation. The mock election was
done without bias and intervention from any external persona,” The SPARK
stated on a Facebook post.
Several student organizations have voiced out support, urging the
administration to uphold independence and protect student journalists, and
have sparked discussions about press freedom and political influence in
academic institutions.